Da, P.M-ul canadian defileaza cu copii (sau copiii ?!) la marsuri ale homosexualilor. Ce e rau în asta ? Sunt homosexuali, nu pedofili. Nu stiu cum poti sta linistit când stii ca pe Cerul Sfânt al Patriei, luminat de Sfântul Soare care l-a vazut nascându-se pe Decebal pot zbura avioane construite si pilotate de catre oameni atât de vraiste precum canadienii.
Ma rog, nu stiu ce are a face discutia asta cu geopolitica. Mai aproape de noi, mai românesc si european, asa, dar în ton cu zicerile de mai sus, avem si noi nazdravaniile noastre :
Nu e nimic rau ca idiotul isi plimba copii(sic)la marsuri ale homosexualilor? Nu e nimic rau ca un copil de 8 ani declara senin ca daca parintii nu sunt deacord cu schimbarea de sex solutia e sa-ti schimbi parintii...apai e grav. Daca nu ar fi de plans , ar fi de ras... PAi iti doresc ca atunci cand vei avea un copil ,pe la 8 anisori sa te anunte ca te schimba cu alt parinte.
Canada a legiferat impotriva a ceea ce este argumentatie stiintifica riguroasa. Ideologia castiga in disputa cu stiinta, in pofida invocarii obsesive a celei din urma de ideologia neomarxist-progresista dominanta in prezent in mass-media si academia. Stiu, sunt tone de articole scare scriu "contra". Partea adversa invoca la randul ei probitate stiintifica, insa in spate nu este decat trend ideologic. "Identitatea" transgender este o simpla tulburare mentala si nimic altceva. De aceea folosesc un ton atat de peremptoriu. Iar cine legifereaza asa ceva este pur si simplu iresponsabil si criminal.
Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: Transgender is ‘Mental Disorder;' Sex Change ‘Biologically Impossible’
By Michael W. Chapman | June 2, 2015 | 1:34 PM EDT
(CNSNews.com) -- Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.
Dr. McHugh, the author of six books and at least 125 peer-reviewed medical articles, made his remarks in a recent commentary in the Wall Street Journal, where he explained that transgender surgery is not the solution for people who suffer a “disorder of ‘assumption’” – the notion that their maleness or femaleness is different than what nature assigned to them biologically.
He also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgendered people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people. Dr. McHugh further noted studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic of children who had expressed transgender feelings but for whom, over time, 70%-80% “spontaneously lost those feelings.”
While the Obama administration, Hollywood, and major media such as Time magazine promote transgenderism as normal, said Dr. McHugh, these “policy makers and the media are doing no favors either to the public or the transgendered by treating their confusions as a right in need of defending rather than as a mental disorder that deserves understanding, treatment and prevention.” “This intensely felt sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder in two respects. The first is that the idea of sex misalignment is simply mistaken – it does not correspond with physical reality. The second is that it can lead to grim psychological outcomes.” The transgendered person’s disorder, said Dr. McHugh, is in the person’s “assumption” that they are different than the physical reality of their body, their maleness or femaleness, as assigned by nature. It is a disorder similar to a “dangerously thin” person suffering anorexia who looks in the mirror and thinks they are “overweight,” said McHugh. Ad Feedback
This assumption, that one’s gender is only in the mind regardless of anatomical reality, has led some transgendered people to push for social acceptance and affirmation of their own subjective “personal truth,” said Dr. McHugh. As a result, some states – California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts – have passed laws barring psychiatrists, “even with parental permission, from striving to restore natural gender feelings to a transgender minor,” he said.
The pro-transgender advocates do not want to know, said McHugh, that studies show between 70% and 80% of children who express transgender feelings “spontaneously lose those feelings” over time. Also, for those who had sexual reassignment surgery, most said they were “satisfied” with the operation “but their subsequent psycho-social adjustments were no better than those who didn’t have the surgery.” “And so at Hopkins we stopped doing sex-reassignment surgery, since producing a ‘satisfied’ but still troubled patient seemed an inadequate reason for surgically amputating normal organs,” said Dr. McHugh.
The former Johns Hopkins chief of psychiatry also warned against enabling or encouraging certain subgroups of the transgendered, such as young people “susceptible to suggestion from ‘everything is normal’ sex education,” and the schools’ “diversity counselors” who, like “cult leaders,” may “encourage these young people to distance themselves from their families and offer advice on rebutting arguments against having transgender surgery.” Dr. McHugh also reported that there are “misguided doctors” who, working with very young children who seem to imitate the opposite sex, will administer “puberty-delaying hormones to render later sex-change surgeries less onerous – even though the drugs stunt the children’s growth and risk causing sterility.”
Such action comes “close to child abuse,” said Dr. McHugh, given that close to 80% of those kids will “abandon their confusion and grow naturally into adult life if untreated ….”
“’Sex change’ is biologically impossible,” said McHugh. “People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.”
Canada a legiferat impotriva a ceea ce este argumentatie stiintifica riguroasa. "Identitatea" transgender este o simpla tulburare mentala si nimic altceva. De aceea folosesc un ton atat de peremptoriu. Iar cine legifereaza asa ceva este pur si simplu iresponsabil si criminal.
... sau a privit în societate, a mai citit o carte si nu beneficiaza de expertiza unei coalitii pentru familie ?! Pai ce facem, îi facem bolnavi mintal pe toti, asa, la gramada ? Bolnavi si hijra, si muxhe, si katoï,si galli din vechime ?
Recunoasterea unei realitati e iresponsabila si criminala ? Si, în sfârsit, cu ce anume influenteaza geopolitica legiferarea asta ? Judecam ce a facut Manning dupa sex, sau dupa fapte ? Sau o fi facut ce a facut din cauza de sex ? Dacul pur si fara dubii trebuie sa aiba o idee (una singura) si despre asta.
Dragii mei,daca tre' sa vina nenea doctorul pt a spune evidente e problematic in sine.Dar se rezolva simplu,cu manualul de liceu.La nivel de cromozomi,daca este XY iese baiat,daca e XX e fata.Cum structura cromozomiala nu poate fi schimbata,treaba e clara dpdv stiintific.
Nebunii nu-s problema.Problema e ca te baga la parnaie daca-i spui nebunului ca e nebun.Dar si daca nu-i spui asta,tot nu e bine.Trebuie sa-i sufli in fund.Sau la zdup.Prin lege. De nebuni nu s-a dus lipsa vreodata.Dar aici nu e vorba de ei.Is doar un pretext.Si dupa astia de azi se gaseste repede un alt grup oropsit.E vorba de putere si control in stil comunist.
Sa vedem totusi partea buna.Problemele demografice ale Romaniei se vor rezolva intr-o generatie.Toti aia plecatii vor face aliyah inapoi in spatiul carpato-danubiano-pontic.
Prostii si banii nu fac casa buna impreuna,iar comunismul prospera o vreme doar in tari bogate.Dar astea nu raman bogate mai mult de o generatie.
Al naibii liceu' ala care ascunde existenta perechilor nascute cu XX si XY
Ce e hazliu e cum o normare a unei situatii duce la concluzii categorice ("Canadienii ? Niste comunisti cretini, dom'le!") Printre altele, o societate evoluata îi protejeaza pe cei expusi, pe cei slabi, pe cei care nu intra-n norma. Stiu ca la noi ar trebui eliminati multi din peisajul social, fie ei tigani, unguri, homosexuali, câini vagabonzi, handicapati, arabi...dar n-as lua societatea noastra drept reper universal valabil.
Despre visul asta al românilor pe care visam sa-i vedem întorsi acasa, e de discutat. Despre vis, zic. Dar, daca tu zici ca într-o generatie se întorc toti, asa o fi. Trebuie sa mai vrea si aceia.
Exemplele cu homosexuali eruditi sunt puerile. Procentual intre eruditii comunitatii homo si cei ai comunitatii hetero...diferenta este astronomica. Sunt doar exceptiile care confirma regula.
E cineva vinovat pentru ca e transsexual, homosexual, tigan,etc. ? E o vina apriorica ? E vreun merit personal în a te naste român, american, francez, blond, negru ? Daca raspunsul e "da" la vreuna dintre întrebari, atunci ne luam scaunelul si ne asezam lânga Hans Günther în asteptarea urmatorului apartheid, segregari, Shoah.
Bun, canadienii, nemtii, australienii si americanii sunt niste comunisti decadenti cretini care legifereaza "nenaturalul". La fel o fi si cu India, e si aia neo-bla,bla,bla, decadenta si occidentala ?
Unui idiot n-ai vreme sa-i faci educatie, ca pâna-l educi tu el pune mâna pe ranga si sare sa dea în aia care îi spune lui cineva ca sunt sursa problemelor lui. Si atunci faci niste legi, legalizezi o stare de fapt si toata lumea-i linistita. Toata lumea, în afara de idiotul respectiv care se plânge ca "nu e liber " . Ba e liber, dar obligat la bunacuviinta.
P.S : nu tin minte sa fi vazut prin tarisoara noastra oameni amendati de militieni pentru ca scuipau pe jos, ca faceau caca pe trotuar, ca vomau dupa ce bausera prin gradinile oraselor. Nici pietoni amendati ca trec precum animalele strada n-am prea vazut. La comunistii aia de americani, canadieni, elvetieni, nemti, englezi, danezi, olandezi am vazut. Îngradirea libertatilor, banuiesc.
Acum ce faci? Amesteci rasele cu deviatiile sexuale? Cu oamenii cu probleme psihice? Inainte erai mai interesant. Chiar si cand scriai de pe mai multe conturi. Acum parca citesc mainstream media leftista neo-marxista...repeti aceleasi clisee...
La aceleasi tâmpenii pe care le aduci aici mi-e dificil sa fiu multiplu în exprimare.
Ai tu obsesia asta cu multitudinea de conturi, ai mai spus-o. La câte nazbâtii ai scris, e firesc sa ti se para ca "lumea" e multiplicarea unuia de care nu-ti place tie.
Forums
